Posted July 8, 2008
This year, Hokkaido Toyako, Japan, is
hosting heads of state of some of the world’s most developed nations, the Group
of 8, in their 34th annual summit to discuss, debate, and potentially reach
consensus on addressing the challenges that face our world today.
The G8 summit is one of the
only global summits in which leaders of the nations debate freely amongst
themselves. With much less administrative structure surrounding the G8 than
other multi-lateral organizations or frameworks, it theoretically allows for
freer dialogue and a more direct follow-up on the decisions made regarding key
international issues.
Thus, the G8 summit has
particular importance in setting the tone for the way in which the leaders of
some of the world’s most powerful nations regard and address today’s global
challenges. This year, governments, religious leaders, and civil societies
around the world are looking to the leaders to take strong action on the global
environment and climate change, on fulfilling commitments to aid and support in
the pursuit of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), on anti-proliferation
and peace building, and global economic issues.
Africa has been in the spotlight in particular, after having borne the
brunt of this spring’s spike in global food prices while seeing very little of
the development assistance and debt relief promised at the 2005 G8 summit in
Gleneagles, Scotland.
Religious Call to Action
Earlier this month, leaders from
Religions for Peace, the world’s largest and most representative multi-religious coalition,
also recognized the significance of this summit and the pressing importance of acting
on today’s global challenges when they met at the “World Religious Leaders
Summit for Peace” to construct a joint perspective on those challenges. The
coalition, in their statement for the G8 leaders, highlighted their common
commitment to peace and called for bold movement on important global issues within
a framework that focuses on
the “fundamental inter-relatedness of all persons and the environment.”
As AFJN watches the
discussions of the world leaders at this year’s Summit, it celebrates the unity and wisdom of
the Religions for Peace coalition and
calls on the G8 nations to listen to their appeal for a sustainable and
equitable pursuit of peace and for significant action on climate change and the
fight against global poverty.
Read the full statement below
Read more about G8 here
Call
from Sapporo - World Religious Leaders Summit for Peace
On the occasion of the G8
Hokkaido Toyako Summit
July
3, 2008
Sapporo, Japan
INTRODUCTION
We, senior leaders of the world's religions, have convened in a World Religious
Leaders Summit for Peace in Sapporo,
Japan, just
prior to the Group of Eight (G8) Hokkaido Toyako Summit. We are united in
our commitment to peace, which includes our concern for the inviolable dignity
of all people, the dire suffering of so many and the well-being of our shared
Earth.
We carry forward important work begun in multi-religious meetings held just
prior to the G8 summits in Moscow (2006) and Cologne (2007). We
have been convened by Religions
for Peace-Japan
in partnership with the World Conference of Religions
for Peace.
We are united in our call to the G8 to take bold action to address the threats
that confront humanity, including the destruction of the environment and
climate change, extreme global poverty and deteriorating food security, nuclear
arms, terrorism and violent conflict. Addressing these threats requires urgent
action by the G8.
Action by all governments, civil society, private sector, religious communities
and-in the final analysis-every member of the human family is required to
advance the common good. We urge the G8 to respond in ways designed to
engage these stakeholders in building our common future.
Religious communities have roles in building peace. Before outlining
these roles, we acknowledge with genuine sorrow that all religions have at
times been misused in fomenting violence. (1)
We reject this misuse of religions and commit ourselves to engaging our
communities for the common good. Collectively, our religious communities
are the world's largest social networks which reach into the furthest corners
of the earth and include countless institutions dedicated to caring for
people. Religions share many moral traditions that can provide basic
principles essential for just and harmonious relations among persons and
communities. Moreover, religious traditions-each in its own way-cultivate
spiritualities of compassion and love essential for genuine reconciliation and
peace. Mobilizing these great social, moral and spiritual dimensions of
the world's religions in service of the common good is essential for the
well-being of the human family. We are united in the conviction that all
religions obligate their followers to work for justice among all peoples, and
to care for one another and our common home, the earth. We commit to
doing so.
OUR COMMITMENT
As religious leaders, we are committed to the path of multi-religious
cooperation for peace. Religious traditions-each in its own way-summons
their followers to the path of multi-religious cooperation for the common
good. This path:
• Leads to senior religious leaders from all faith traditions
and billions of believers working together for a positive and holistic state of
peace;
• Enjoins the world's believers to engage their moral
heritages and spiritual traditions in taking individual responsibility for
protecting our earth;
• Brings politicians, civil society and religious communities
together to forge needed consensus on values that can serve as the basis of
just and creative policies.
SHARED SECURITY
An overarching notion that we believe can help express the comprehensive
character of our moral and religious concerns is "Shared Security."
Shared Security builds on the concept of Human Security by focusing on the
fundamental inter-relatedness of all persons and the environment.
Shared Security includes a comprehensive respect for the interconnectedness and
dignity of all life. It is based upon our mutual interdependence and the
most universal and fundamental fact that all humans live in one world. It
recognizes that the well-being of one is related to the well-being of others and
ultimately to the earth that we all share. It calls us to recognize that
past, present and future are linked. Together, we must acknowledge past
failings, face present challenges and accept our responsibilities to future
generations.
Shared Security is concerned with the full continuum of human relations-from
relationships among individuals to the ways that peoples are organized in
nations or international organizations. It respects state sovereignty, but also
supports democratic and transparent cooperation among states and peoples.
It follows that the security of one actor of international relations must not
be detrimental to others. International actors who are responsible for
global decision-making must act transparently and be open to the contributions
of all stakeholders, including religious communities which represent a major
part of civil society. A similar concern for a just world order,
respecting different national and religious traditions, was made at the Moscow
World Summit of Religious Leaders (2006).
As religious leaders, we recognize that there is a foundational moral
imperative for advancing Shared Security: We are all responsible for one
another's well-being.
CALLS TO ACTION
We call upon the G8 to include in their discussions and plans of action the
following areas of concern:
1.
The Destruction of the Environment and Climate Change
Japan, the host of this year's G8 Summit, possesses a spiritual term,
mottainai, meaning "do not waste, use everything in a fashion commensurate with
its true value." This concept recognizes the mysterious "giftedness" of
all existence, and urges that natural resources must be used appropriately,
while simultaneously encouraging responsible and sustainable consumption. The
concept also provides a base for recognizing that it is unethical to burden
future generations with excessive pollution or other gross environmental
imbalances. Development must be environmentally sustainable.
We must also draw attention to the link between the health of the environment
and war. In addition to killing people, disrupting the lives of entire
societies and thwarting development, war destroys the ecosystem. Massive
defense expenditures, a global total of US$ 1.34 Trillion in 2007 according to
the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, both directly assaults
the ecosystem and squanders monies that urgently need to be directed to
sustainable development. It is a grave contradiction to advocate for a
reduction of global warming gas emissions while simultaneously maintaining or
even expanding military expenditures.
We urge the G8 Summit to:
• Commit to a reduction of total national defense and
military expenditures and utilize the saved funds to establish an Earth Fund
dedicated to environmental protection.
• Establish a new binding framework to follow up the Kyoto
Protocols that limits global average temperature rise to avert catastrophic
climate change.
• Provide leadership to expand energy efficiency and
conservation efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emission rates.
• Advance policies and practices that increase forestation
and other forms of carbon dioxide sequestration.
• Recognize that trading "global warming gas emission rights"
has at best limited value, and could disproportionately penalize the least
developed.
• Facilitate major investments in the development of new
sources of energy and technology essential to sustainable development,
specifically without jeopardizing food security.
• Implement the recommendations contained in the Kobe 3R Action Plan
(Reduce, Reuse, Recycle).
2.
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)
The massive scale of extreme poverty at a time of unprecedented wealth is a
moral scandal. Poverty is exacerbated by structural injustices in the
global economy which must be addressed. At the mid-point of the Millennium
Development Campaign, religious leaders gathered at the Cologne World Summit of
Religious Leaders (2007). They recognized an urgent need to not only fulfill
the pledges, but in some instances, to exceed the commitments made.
Meeting these challenges is even more urgent, not least due to the growing food
crisis. Here again, we call for the funds achieved from the reduction of
defense budgets to be allocated in support of sustainable development and
poverty reduction.
We request the G8 Summit to:
• Take leadership to ensure the achievement of the MDGs,
including delivery on the Gleneagles aid quantity and quality promises,
particularly reaching the goal 0.7% of Gross National Income for Official
Development Assistance.
• Provide urgently needed global leadership to address the
growing crisis of food shortages, including needed emergency responses.
• Meet its pledges of increased resources to scale up the
response to HIV and AIDS, Malaria, and other infectious diseases, and to ensure
universal access to HIV and AIDS prevention, treatment and care services by
2010.
• Dedicate resources to empower women and girls as key agents
in overcoming poverty.
• Make the legal empowerment of the poor a key objective in
its development assistance strategies.
• Fulfill its commitment to ensuring a development friendly
outcome of the Doha Round of trade negotiations.
3.
Nuclear Disarmament
Mindful that the 2008 G8 Summit is taking place in Japan, the only country that
has suffered the horror of a nuclear attack, we religious leaders stand in
solidarity with our Japanese hosts to call for the elimination of all nuclear
weapons. We believe that the attempt to militarily dominate the sea,
space, neutral territories or states creates obstacles on the way to nuclear
and conventional disarmament. We also believe that conventional
disarmament and efforts to ban military technologies and initiatives that could
provoke a new arms race should go hand in hand with efforts to advance nuclear
disarmament.
We request the G8 Summit to:
• Pursue rigorous implementation of nuclear reduction and
nonproliferation policies leading to the goal of total nuclear disarmament. As
stipulated in article 6 of the Treaty on Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons
(NPT), the five acknowledged nuclear-weapon states must act on their
commitments to work toward eliminating existing nuclear weapons as rapidly as
possible. States with nuclear weapons that have not acknowledged them
must acknowledge their possession, make similar commitments to their
elimination and enter into the NPT.
• Push for prompt ratifications and entry into force of the
Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty and commit to take no action leading toward the
reintroduction of any form of nuclear weapons testing.
• Continue to demonstrate positive leadership for the
implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1540 and other global
initiatives to control the transfer of nuclear materials and stop further
proliferation.
4.
Terrorism and Violent Conflict
Terrorism-the intentional killing of innocent people as a way of achieving a
political objective-is never morally justified whether it is perpetrated by
individuals, groups or states. Moreover, military responses to terrorism
injure innocent persons, provide additional motivation for terrorist groups and
endanger basic freedoms in the societies attempting to protect themselves from
terrorism.
Violent military conflict-the attempt to settle serious disputes by military
force-typically results in the loss of innocent lives, disruption of society,
thwarting of development and destruction of the environment.
Every effort must be made to utilize non-violent means to thwart terrorism and
resolve disputes to advance peace.
We call upon the G8 to:
• Provide global leadership designed to combat the
victimization of groups based on culture or creed.
• Work to end occupation and establish just, honorable and
comprehensive peace in all countries or territories which are occupied.
• Re-affirm and strengthen its commitment to standards of
international law in its efforts to counteract terrorism and promote
international security.
• Acknowledge and support the importance of multi-religious
partnerships to help address the problems of terrorism and violent
conflict.
• Work to limit the production and export of arms into areas
of violent conflict.
• Promote a culture of peace by advancing non-violent
conflict resolution and peace education.
CONCLUSION
The G8 has the responsibility to use boldness and wisdom to advance the common
good in partnership with the religious communities and all other
stakeholders.
We-leaders of diverse religious communities-re-commit ourselves to working
together and with other partners of good will to address the threats that
confront us all. While we labor to meet the challenges of our day, we are
deeply mindful of religious traditions which have taught-each in its own
way-compassion, forgiveness and reconciliation, and that these are essential
for genuine peace.
We respectfully urge the G8 to recognize, facilitate and effectively support
the importance of multi-religious cooperation, as it takes needed steps to
advance the common good.
(1) We recall and embrace as our own an historic multi-religious
acknowledgement on the misuse of religion: "As men and women of
religions, we confess in humility and penitence that we have very often
betrayed our religious ideals and our commitment to peace. It is not
religion that has failed the cause of peace, but religious people. This
betrayal of religion can and must be corrected." (From the global
multi-religious Declaration adopted at the
Religions for Peace First World Assembly in Kyoto, Japan,
1970.)
|