|
By Bahati Ntama Jacques
Publushed March 15, 2008
After the violence,
death, and displacement in Kenya,
it seems the leaders have finally agreed upon a power-sharing deal that
placates both sides. Kenya's
conflict has now subsided from the news headlines and it is hoped that the
country will begin to reestablish itself as a stable African nation. However,
it is important that we continue to examine the issues at play in Kenya and that we do not divert our eyes from
the continent of Africa. What lessons can we
learn from the Kenya
example? What is it that we, as advocates for peace in Africa, need to know to
prevent another crisis such as Kenya's?
The end of authoritarian
regimes will be the beginning of peace and prosperity in Africa.
Authoritarian regimes are one-party states headed by the president who runs
the nation with a few elites; or in their modern forms, the leader allows for
the creation of other parties to establish a pseudo-democracy, but the
government remains non-democratic. These regimes are corrupt, greedy,
oppressive, controlling, and limit citizen participation in government. Power
is often in the hands of the elites and decisions are made by a few in the name
of all citizens. Uganda
fits this description. Zimbabwe fits
this description. Libya, Cameroon, and Equatorial Guinea fit this
description. To end such regimes, many opposition leaders find it
necessary to take up arms and fight from inside as well as from neighboring
nations. Many African leaders get into power by force or use force to
remain in power.
The current Chadian
President Idriss Déby and his rebel group the Patriotic Salvation Movement
overthrew former president of Chad Hissene Habre in 1990 with military support
from both the Sudanese and Libyan governments. In 2005, he campaigned for
a referendum that amended the constitution thereby extending the presidential
term beyond two years. The referendum allowed him to run and win the
presidential election for the third time in 2006 after wins in both 1996 and
2001. President Yoweri Museveni of Uganda has followed a similar
course, changing the constitution in 2005 to allow himself a third run at the
presidency. Museveni, once known as the first in a line of new, legitimate, and
hopeful African leaders, has now been in power since 1986 and is growing
increasingly corrupt with each year in office.
Today, Chad and Uganda are not listed as military
dictatorial regimes. In this way, Western powers have been apathetic in
making sure African leaders learn the democratic principles. Instead, the
West helps them strengthen their oppressive regimes, perhaps in part because
they still adhere to the philosophy of the Berlin Conference of 1885. In
dividing up the states of Africa, European
powers had in mind exploitation, not development. This Western view of Africa
as the place for resources continues to make Africa
susceptible to authoritarian regimes and therefore a perfect and favorable
ground for internal and interstate conflicts.
Mobutu Sese Seko, former
president of Zaire, now the Democratic Republic of the Congo,
stayed in power from 1965-1997 despite strong internal opposition and armed
rebellions. The United States of
America, interested in Congo's Cold War support and
natural resources such as Uranium, disregarded Mobutu's human rights violations
and helped him survive the Congolese people's attempt to end his
oppression. France and
Belgium
also defended Mobutu against those who opposed his policies. Finally, in
1996, Mobutu faced two determined enemies: aserious prostate cancer which
took his life only shortly after his second enemy Laurent Desire Kabila took
power in an invasion lead by Rwandan, Ugandan and Burundian troops. Some
African regimes like Mobutu's are guilty of human rights abuses enough to call them
out of their offices, but many have grown so strong at home and abroad that it
is hard to depose of them peacefully. Others, such as Egyptian president
Hosni Mubarak who has been in power since 1952 and Libyan president Muammar
Al-Gaddafi who has been in power since 1969 have secured their power at home
and have continuously ignored voices against their dictatorships from the
international community.
Bad governance is key to understanding conflicts
in and between African nations. African administrations tend to be more
exclusive than inclusive. Politicizing and mismanaging the rich ethnic
African diversity continues to be one of the causes of political crises and is
often followed by ethnic wars. The Hutu-Tutsi wars in Rwanda and Burundi were the result of
exclusive and marginalizing approaches to governing multiethnic states.
Even though there is relative peace in these two nations today, the scars from the many and long
wars may burst at any time if nothing is done in terms of good governance, peace,
reconciliation, and prevention of conflict.
One of the most
significant groups to suffer from political exclusion is that of women. Women
often find it difficult – if not impossible – to participate in political
processes and their rights tend to come secondary to those of men. However,
many African countries have proven to be quite responsive to the importance of
putting women in positions of leadership. Under President Paul Kagame, Rwanda has
taken the lead with a constitution that requires at least 30% of its leadership
to be women. Research studies show that countries which have undergone
civil conflict and have seen a complete restructuring of their political system
tend to include women in government in far greater numbers than countries which
have not experienced conflict. The
reason for this, experts argue, is that it is much more difficult to put women
into an already-established governing body than to write women into a newly
forming political system.
However, when a
government fails to equally distribute resources and opportunities across the
nation, this becomes ground for conflict. People are starving, they lack
healthcare, and literacy rates are stagnating while leaders are depositing
state funds into personal bank accounts and are living luxurious
lifestyles. It is because people are poor that rebel groups find recruits
to fight for change with violence instead of using nonviolence and
diplomacy.
In conclusion, even if each case of conflict in
Africa is complex, the causes of conflicts in Africa
are commonly political, geopolitical, economic and social. Africa Faith
and Justice Network believes that lasting peace, real democracy and economic
prosperity will never be sustainable if African leaders continue to take power
by force. The rule of law, accountability, visionary leadership and a
strong civil society are imperatives to progress in Africa
|