|
On
Thursday, September 7, 2007, the Senate voted 81-12 to approve the fiscal year
2008 Foreign Aid Spending Bill (HR 2764 )
that would increase funds to fight HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria
worldwide. The $34 billion measure would increase President Bush's $4.2 billion
request for funds to fight HIV/AIDS globally by $940 million (Taylor, AP/International
Herald Tribune, 9/6). The measure would increase the U.S. contribution to
the Global Fund to
Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria to $590 million (HR 2764 text , 9/7). In June the House passed companion legislation. Now,
the House and Senate will go to committee and begin negotiations over a final
version.
The Senate bill would not only increase funding for
the fight against HIV/AIDS but would also allow President Bush and future
presidents to waive the President's
Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief's (PEPFAR) abstinence spending
requirement. Currently, by law, at least one-third of HIV prevention funds that
focus countries receive through PEPFAR must be used for
abstinence-until-marriage programs. By allowing for the possibility of this
restriction to be lifted, the door then is opened to family planning programs
and programs promoting contraceptives, including condoms, to receive government
funding and thus boost the fight against HIV/AIDS. This particular provision
would increase efforts in the fight on HIV/AIDS; however, other portions of the
bill are not so uplifting.
In addition to increasing funds to fight HIV/AIDS,
the spending bill would also allocate $1.2 billion for the Millennium Challenge Corporation,
a program meant to encourage economic and political reforms in developing
countries. Unfortunately, Bush had originally requested $3 billion for MCC (AP/International
Herald Tribune, 9/6). "A reduction of this magnitude is unacceptable
and would severely undermine MCC's efforts to reduce poverty in countries that
practice good governance, particularly in Africa, and make it more difficult
for the United States to meet its commitment to double aid to Africa by
2010," the Office of
Management and Budget said in a statement (Pulizzi, Dow Jones/Nasdaq, 9/6). One may wonder what this has to do
with fighting HIV/AIDS, but massive bilateral and multilateral debt strains the
resources of many developing countries that therefore have very little
financially to contribute to the fight of this deadly disease and thus rely heavily
if not completely on foreign support. Many within the medical and political
realm believe that if Africa can be relieved of 50 percent of its external
bilateral debt, it would permit a doubling of spending on HIV/AIDS.
Here at AFJN, a close eye is keeping watch over
these proceedings and will do all that it can to be sure that the policies
passed by the US government are just and made in the best interest of all
parties.
-Barbie Fischer
|